Thursday, March 5, 2020

Vice Presidential Debate Live-Journal

Vice Presidential Debate Live-Journal eonline.com 8:47: The panel seems to think it’d be a good idea for Pence to tell some personal stories about his blossoming relationship with the Trump family, the idea being that this would be a good opportunity to humanize Trump. Yeah, maybe. But it isn’t it discomfiting that we’re casually discussing the fact that it’s a month away from the election and we’re not totally convinced of Trump’s humanity? 8:56: Coop’s elegant style, sharp comportment, and sophisticated incorporation of spectacles makes the whole idea of aging a lot more palatable. 8:59: Get me out of this panel purgatory. 9:00: Cutting directly from Coop to Wolf Blitzer is hilariously unfair to Wolf. 9:02: The Candidates make their distinguished walk to the stage and then just kind of plop down in goofy swivel-chairs. usatoday.com 9:07: There’s a kind of refreshing sense of old-school cordiality between the candidates as they both begin the debate with pretty strong, clearly rehearsed answers to Elaine Quijano’s first question. 9:10: Kaine seemed like a relatively banal pick for Clinton, but it’s becoming clearer why she tipped him. He appears to really relish being her cheerleader/chief attack dog. He also follows the same “affable everyman” role that Biden filled so effectively. 9:12: Pence says the Clinton campaign has been an “avalanche of insults”… I genuinely think he’s never seen Trump’s Twitter account. 9:15: Maybe framing a debate as an “open discussion” isn’t the most prudent move. Candidates constantly interrupting each other. 9:16: That cordiality, yeah, it didn’t last. 9:18: Pence is pretty strong on the economy, inasmuch as he can tout some specious economic arguments while seeming credible. 9:19: “Do you want a ‘you’re fired’ plan, or do you want a ‘you’re hired’ plan?” Kaine asks. The Clinton campaign really needs to put the kibosh on the witticisms. 9:21: Pence has resting “I’m so disappointed in you” face. Probably an appropriate demeanor for a Trump VP. 9:23: “You can roll out the numbers, but people in Scranton know different” Pence says. Anti-intellectualism is core to his economic arguments. 9:25: Pence is so weak answering questions about Trump’s taxes. Absolutely flailing, it’s gotta be embarrassing for him. Kaine’s attacks are obvious but they’re scathing. “He’s going to release his tax returns when the audit is over.” Yeesh. 9:30: I wonder what Coop thinks about all of this. 9:35: Pence just explicitly said that we need to stop accusing police forces of institutional racism. “When African-American police officers are involved in the shooting of an African-American, how can Hilary Clinton bring up bias?” he asked. Just a total misunderstanding of what how institutional bias metastasizes throughout institutions, regardless of the individual. 9:42: Pence finally brings up the “basket of deplorables.” It’s astounding that it’s taken one and a half debates for this to come up. I’d almost forgotten about it. I think it shows a serious paucity of political acumen that it’s taken so long for them to try and capitalize on one of Clinton’s only real gaffes. cnn.com 9:46: Kaine has been taking up Trump’s interrupter mantle all night. It seems like a deliberate strategic move but I’m not sure how well it’ll play. Trump supporters will definitely revel in the fact that they can finally accuse a political opponent of being obtrusive. 9:50: Kaine, and the Clinton campaign in general, has always been at their best when simply reciting Trump’s words back verbatim. There’s absolutely no convincing retort that Pence can muster. 9:52: Pence’s revisionism on Iraq is crazy. His conception of history seems to be that we won the initial war without significant difficulty or consequence, and that failed negotiations and management on the part of the Obama administration were the only direct antecedents to the rise of ISIS. Maybe some of his supporters will buy that, but it’s patently insane. Pence’s ardor for the Iraq war also chafes against his running mate’s (er, false) claim that he didn’t support the invasion. But, I mean, I guess the Trump campaign has more pressing problems to address than message coherence. 10:00: I disagree with nearly everything Pence is saying but he is SO MUCH MORE competent than Trump. If Trump was asked specific questions about no-fly zones in Syria it would be an abject disaster. Pence can, at the very least, articulate a response. 10:04: The way Kaine keeps invoking Raegan makes me uncomfortable as a progressive. I get the political calculusâ€"he’s trying to attract disaffected republicansâ€"but I don’t like our only viable left-of-center ticket valorizing Reagan Conservatism. 10:05: It seems like Pence’s plan is to simply act disgusted/dismissive whenever Kaine makes obvious attacks against Trump’s character. In a way, it works. The conversation moves on. But it’s also hilarious to see Pence try and dismiss the asinine things Trump has said. 10:10: Pence just said “this isn’t the old days where you can just say stuff and people will believe it.” I mean… come on… does he have no sense of irony? 10:15: Extensive talks about Russia. Putin probably loves the fact that there’s an entire segment in a major vice presidential debate devoted to talking about him. This is the kind of exertion of soft power that he thrives on. Dude is a cold war thinker and we’re kind of servicing him here. 10:17: It took nearly two full debates for Trump/Pence to bring up the Clinton Foundation, which is one of the main sources of her popular distrust. But here’s the thing, nobody has ever found any creditable examples of malfeasance perpetrated by the foundation. In fact, it’s one of the most successful charity organizations in history. 10:20: I wish there was a box in the bottom corner of the screen showing Coop’s real-time reactions. 10:24: Kaine fails to talk about how he reconciles his faith with his pro-choice political stance, when the moderator seemed to be setting him up to talk about that specific topic in detail. It’s worth nothing that he was something of a late-adopter of both pro-choice and LGBTQ rights positions. 10:27: Lots of scripture quoting going on. Makes me queasy. 10:35: As the debate ends, both candidates explain that they’re confident that they’ll be able to unify the country if elected. If this debate, and this entire election cycle, has shown us anything, it’s that there are serious fissures in the American polity that can’t be remedied over the course of one or two terms. It’s nice to think that we’ll all come together again after November, but this election has revealed how fractious our politics have really become. These aren’t problems of ideology or policy disputes, they’re problems of identity anxiety. There’s a profound fear of change that can’t be assuaged by any one president. But the country won’t stop changing, so either these problems will continue to grow in extremity, or we’ll do some serious collective introspection and decide that a shifting world doesn’t actually portend disaster. 10:47: Back to you, Coop. salon.com

Is Abortion A Basic Right

Is Abortion A Basic Right Photo by thecrazyfilmgirl via Flickr.com I think we can all agree that when people assume things about us or overgeneralize about people like us, it tends to become frustrating. And really for most of us that is an understatement. Assumptions about who we are or what we believe are usually deal breakers when it comes to relationships. We are probably not going to become friends with or even tolerate people who have derogatory opinions about us when they do not even know us. And yet whenever politicians do this exact same thing we seem perfectly fine going along with or choosing to ignore whatever they say. Enter president Obama’s speech at the Planned Parenthood national convention. On Friday the president gave a speech in which he basically said that abortion is a basic right for women’s health and that those politicians opposing it are trying to bring back policies better suited for the 1950s. Now there are a couple things about this that bother me, but at the heart of it are the two assumptions that the president makes here. One is that women consider abortion to be a basic health right, and the other is that only a small portion of old fashion politicians oppose abortion. First I would just like to say that as a 19-year-old, non-politician, woman, I do not support abortion. And quite frankly I do not think that I am the only one that feels that way. I find it extremely ironic that the president is constantly calling conservatives out of touch, when it is my belief that these assumptions of his about women, and Americans in general, are extremely out of touch. Many people believe that abortion is actually less popular today than it was when it was passed, because of the advancements in science that have occurred since then. And what is more, his assumption that all women feel the way that those in Planned Parenthood do about abortion, is completely unfounded. Many women are opposed to abortion and to speak about it as if it is some kind of necessity for us, is not only worn but somewhat sexist. I apologize if this sounds as if I am complaining or nitpicking and I understand that politicians try to appeal to the audience that they are standing before, but this really bothered me. I personally do not like the president assuming things about me or those around me, especially when it comes to something as controversial as abortion.